This Art History Secret Suggests Hillary Clinton’s Health Is Worse Than We Thought

Readers, take this one anyway you want.....

BY: Blake Seitz

Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has been plagued by questions about her health. Those questions intensified after she collapsed in New York City in mid-September and then took several days off from campaigning to recover from pneumonia. Is Hillary OK? Does she have dysphasia, as Katrina Pierson, M.D., has suggested? Does she require an old person’s walker, an advanced exoskeleton, or an elaborate system of pulleys and wires to move, as other experts have suggested? Why does she ride in SUVs with “like almost a little step that comes down,” AKA retractable running boards?

The answer to all these questions may be contained in clues from an esoteric corner of the art world.

Americans were seriously weirded out when a fly landed on Hillary Clinton’s face at last night’s debate.

Fly Lands On Clinton’s Face During Debate (Full Report: https://t.co/8VYD6nM5eT ) https://t.co/i1j6cdLTAy #debatefly #Debate

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) October 10, 2016

Observers pointed to Clinton’s understated reaction to the fly as evidence that she is a robot, like those on the HBO show Westworld. The incident revived basic concerns about Hillary’s status as a member of the species homo sapiens—which she unsuccessfully tried to quash in 2015.

Anyone notice how Clinton didn’t flinch when the fly landed on her? Anyone watch Westworld? They don’t flinch either. THE ROBOTS ARE HERE

— William/Bill Aicher (@BillAicher) October 10, 2016

However, let us stipulate for a second that Hillary is in fact one of us. If we do, then her health may be even more precarious than we thought. As learned observers know, flies serve an important symbolic role in Western art.

UA students 'fear for their safety' over Milo supporters

Egad...

by Amber Athey  
Investigative Reporter

University of Alabama students complained about having to “adjust their schedules” in order to avoid Milo Yiannopoulos supporters, and demanded the school to rescind funding for Milo’s security.

Starting Monday morning, UA protesters flooded the president’s office with three demands in response to a racist incident on campus, as well as the planned appearance of Milo Yiannopoulos that evening, according to The Crimson White.

“Students...fear for their safety because...there will be students on campus that support Milo."

In light of Milo’s visit, the protesters demanded that university visitors comply with the Student Code of Conduct in order to avoid making students feel “unsafe.”

[RELATED: Students worry free speech will make U of M ‘an unsafe place’]

“Anyone on campus, regardless of their affiliation with UA… if they’re on campus, and they’re reserving space to speak or host an event, then they must abide by the Capstone Creed and the code of conduct that we tuition-paying students must comply with,” David Swayne, a UA sophomore, told The Crimson White. “We feel that Milo represents hate speech.”

The protesters claimed that merely knowing that Milo supporters were on campus compelled them to change their schedules so they could avoid anything that would “put [them] at jeopardy.”

“Students have to adjust their schedules… they fear for their safety because… there will be students on campus that support Milo, but there are also going to be his supporters who are not members of our community," said Maya Perry. "They don’t have to adhere to our code of conduct, they can act however they want, and they can put these students at jeopardy."

Past Milo events have required heavy security due to the high volume of protesters, with several even being cancelled due to the “security concerns.” At DePaul University, Breitbart covered a $1,000 security fee, but security guards failed to stop protesters from storming the stage and ruining the event anyway.

[RELATED: Milo demands DePaul refund security cash after its guards did nothing]

In this case, UA hit the College Republicans with a $7,000 charge for event security—nearly seven times an initial estimate—but caved after a meeting with the organizers of the event and agreed to cover the outrageous fee.

“The goal all along has been to make sure they have a successful event. To that end, the College Republicans will not incur any expense for UAPD security,” Chris Bryant, the interim director of the University of Alabama’s Office of Media Relations said in a statement. “The University of Alabama supports free speech and welcomes diverse speakers to our campus. As with all speakers, the views of Mr. Yiannopoulos do not necessarily reflect the views of the university.”

Nonetheless, UA protesters demanded the university rescind the contribution, arguing that the College Republicans should not have invited Milo to speak in the first place because he is “insulting.”

“I think that other organizations on campus take care to respect certain groups on campus just to make sure that they invite speakers who are not going to directly insult anyone’s existence as is,” Perry said. "I think it’s very irresponsible of the College Republicans to invite someone like this to speak knowing how insulting he is to certain marginalized people on campus.”

The protesters’ final demand was for the university to expel Ryan Parrish, a student who made racial threats on social media, arguing that an indefinite suspension and removal from campus was not a harsh enough punishment.

“Ryan Parrish [should] be expelled from the university indefinitely,” Perry said. “We already know that he has been removed from campus and that he is un-enrolled, but I don’t think that many of us believe that punishment is severe enough.”   

Source:   Campus Reform

A change of the newscycle pace: Are E.Ts avoiding Earth?

File photo - Crystal Graham, wearing an extra-terrestrial costume, waits in line for her turn in the UFO costume contest in Roswell (Reuters)

Time for some comic (maybe not) relief....

Are aliens avoiding Earth?
 
By Walt Bonner Published September 23, 2016
Even with all of the advancements in modern technology, we still haven’t made contact with intelligent life on other planets. But what if our attempts to communicate have been ignored?

In 1973, a radio astronomer named John Ball came up with a possible theory as to why aliens – if they do exist – haven’t gotten back to us. Ball’s “Zoo Hypothesis” as it came to be known, posits that alien civilizations exist, and the most highly developed of them have been communicating. This elite alien “club” has come upon a mutual agreement to leave those deemed primitive or “lesser” life forms alone, only to be watched from a distance. Earthlings, therefore, did not make the cut with the galactic cool kids.

So assuming these aliens exist, under what circumstances could they all agree to keep us in the dark? A Scottish astronomer named Duncan Forgan has the answer.

“I was interested in this theory because it is so difficult to test in a scientific fashion,” Forgan told FoxNews.com. “The Zoo Hypothesis relies on us being unable to observe other aliens, so a failure to observe aliens can be used both as evidence for and against the hypothesis at the same time!”
Related:

UFO over St. Louis? Strange light over Gateway Arch sparks debate
Strange 'burning' object spotted in sky over western US
Alien contact could be 1,500 years away, say Cornell astronomers
A UFO? Video captures strange object near Ohio military base

Forgan decided to test the assumptions that make up the hypothesis, instead of the hypothesis itself. One of these assumptions is that intelligent extraterrestrials can agree on a “no contact with primitive worlds” policy.

“Agreement requires communication, which is limited by the speed of light,” Forgan explained.

This would assume that civilizations must have existed long enough for messages to go back and forth between them, a process limited by the speed of light. Another assumption is that life would be able to thrive in a galaxy–wide habitable zone. Forgan entered these assumptions into a computer program, which then went about simulating civilizations and randomly placing them around the habitable zone, measuring the distance between them and calculating the likelihood of any two of them making contact and communicating within their lifetimes.

The computer found that for a "leave the Earthlings alone" agreement to be likely, at least 500 civilizations must exist, each of them having lasted over one million years. Any less than 500 civilizations and there are too many groups of civilizations to form a pact; if any one civilization lasted less than a million years, then there are also too many civilization groups to form the galactic club. (A “civilization group,” Forgan explained, is “a collection of civilizations that are ‘culturally connected’, which basically means that a civilization is aware of the others in the group as soon as it is technologically ready. Weirdly, the civilization groups are actually pretty well-mixed in space, which you wouldn't expect naively - the issue is their separation in space-time, not their separation in space.”)

In other words, Earth may not be in the universal doghouse after all. 

How's he gonna do that? Gov. Jerry Brown helps to save planet by regulating cow flatulence & manure

Yes, this is real.

By Doug Powers • September 20, 2016 07:37 PM

"Many more California dairy farmers will be blaming the dog for their cows’ farts thanks to progs in state government hell-bent to make everything more expensive in the name of fighting “climate change”:

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill Monday that regulates for the first time greenhouse-gas emissions tied to dairy cows and landfills, an escalation of California’s efforts to fight climate change beyond carbon-based gases to include methane and other pollutants.

The move by the Democratic governor targets a category of gases known as short-lived climate pollutants, which have an outsize effect on global warming despite their relatively short life in the atmosphere. Environmentalists hope that tackling short-lived pollutants now would buy time to develop new and more affordable technology to reduce carbon emissions.

The legislation will require steep reductions in a variety of pollutants, including methane; HFC gases used in aerosols and air conditioning refrigerants; and soot, known as black carbon. It’s tied to $90 million in funding for the dairy industry and garbage collectors.

“This bill curbs these dangerous pollutants and thereby protects public health and slows climate change,” Brown said in a statement."

Oh my! The Mahdi Will Return In A Space Ship--- Sort Of

Ayatollah: Mahdi coming back in spaceship!
by Bob Unruh

A prominent Iranian ayatollah says the Mahdi, the end-times Muslim savior, will come back in a spaceship with the sound “of thunder and its power and speed is that of lightning.”

Actually, his recent explanation wasn’t completely clear.

“It is like a spaceship and like other swift and amazing space vessels that are found [only] in stories today, but nobody knows how close [these vessels] come to truth and reality. Maybe it will be like [a spaceship] but in any case it is not a spaceship,” he said.

His description was discovered in an Iranian news report by the Middle East Media Research Institute, which monitors and analyzes media reports in the region.

The comments came from Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi, who operates his own website to promote his views.

He was responding to a question about the “arrival of the Mahdi – the Hidden Imam who is the equivalent of the Messiah in Shiite Islam,” MEMRI reported.

“He explained at length how the Mahdi’s arrival will be high-tech, as befits the modern age,” MEMRI said.

His comments included:
“It was said by Imam Sadegh [the sixth Shiite imam, circa. 700–765 C.E.]: ‘When our Lord arrives, the land will be illuminated by divine light, and [God’s] creations will no longer require sunlight.’ The interpretation of this saying is that the issue of light and energy is expressed in that both in daytime and nighttime powerful lights can replace sunlight.”

“Today we use satellites [and by means of them] cover extensive areas, so that anyone with a receiver can use them… In the time of the Mahdi’s arrival, there will be a powerful apparatus, that may be difficult for us to imagine today, for transmitting images so that the entire world is visible like the palm of a hand. Without worldwide control by an intelligence [apparatus], there can be no unified global regime [as foretold that there will be when the Mahdi arrives], and no peace, security, and decency… Therefore, God grants him this tool… Once again I stress that this is a routine matter, and that it is inconceivable that it will come about based on a miracle; rather [it will come about] by means of ordinary tools that are based on scientific and industrial advances.”

Will Someone In Authority Please Muzzle Nutty Uncle Joe?

Remember this one?

KUHNER: The betrayal of the Navy’s SEAL Team 6
How they were ‘outed’ to assist Obama’s re-election campaign

Navy SEAL Team 6 became a household name for their role in killing Osama bin Laden. On May 1, 2011, the country rightly celebrated the death of bin Laden. The Obama administration, however, wanted to do more. It sought to claim full credit for the assassination, deciding to spike the football. On May 3, at an event in Washington, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. did the unthinkable: He publicly revealed the identity of the special-operations unit responsible for bin Laden’s killing. His reckless action put at risk the lives of every member of SEAL Team 6. The Taliban and other jihadists eager to avenge bin Laden now knew which unit to target. Stunned and shocked, SEAL members immediately realized they were going to be hunted by al Qaeda sympathizers.

Remember how everyone was aghast that at the outing of our most secret and elite team for everyone to see?

Now, we have this gem: 

Vice President Joe Biden revealed during a campaign rally that he had a military aide with the nuclear codes present at the event.
by Charlie Spiering15 Aug 20161043

AG Lynch: Compassion and Love Are Best Response to Terror

 

Egad.  Too much wacky tobaccy?

Posted by Aleister

It should come as a surprise to no one that under Obama, the nation’s top law enforcement officer sounds more like a high school guidance counselor than a prosecutor.

The victims of a terror attack certainly deserve love and compassion but for an attorney general to say this is the best response to terror doesn’t inspire much confidence.

David Rutz of the Washington Free Beacon reported:
 
Lynch: Best Response to Terrorism Is Love and Compassion
Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that love and compassion are the best responses to terrorism during remarks to the media in Orlando, Florida on Tuesday.

Lynch said the Department of Justice stood in solidarity with the LGBT community “in the light” following a Muslim terrorist’s massacre of 49 people at a gay nightclub last week.

“We stand with you to say that the good in this world far outweighs the evil, that our common humanity transcends our differences, and that our most effective response to terror and to hatred is compassion, it’s unity, and it’s love,” Lynch said. “We stand with you today as we grieve together, and long after the cameras are gone, we will continue to stand with you as we grow together in commitment, in solidarity, and in equality.”

Lynch has been in the news for defending the administration’s decision to redact transcripts between law enforcement and the terrorist, Omar Mateen, during his attack.