AG Lynch: Compassion and Love Are Best Response to Terror

 

Egad.  Too much wacky tobaccy?

Posted by Aleister

It should come as a surprise to no one that under Obama, the nation’s top law enforcement officer sounds more like a high school guidance counselor than a prosecutor.

The victims of a terror attack certainly deserve love and compassion but for an attorney general to say this is the best response to terror doesn’t inspire much confidence.

David Rutz of the Washington Free Beacon reported:
 
Lynch: Best Response to Terrorism Is Love and Compassion
Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that love and compassion are the best responses to terrorism during remarks to the media in Orlando, Florida on Tuesday.

Lynch said the Department of Justice stood in solidarity with the LGBT community “in the light” following a Muslim terrorist’s massacre of 49 people at a gay nightclub last week.

“We stand with you to say that the good in this world far outweighs the evil, that our common humanity transcends our differences, and that our most effective response to terror and to hatred is compassion, it’s unity, and it’s love,” Lynch said. “We stand with you today as we grieve together, and long after the cameras are gone, we will continue to stand with you as we grow together in commitment, in solidarity, and in equality.”

Lynch has been in the news for defending the administration’s decision to redact transcripts between law enforcement and the terrorist, Omar Mateen, during his attack. 

U.S. School Bans Some Of Students’ Favorite Items Because It Offends Muslims

Eliminating ANYTHING from our culture because it offends Muslims is sheer dhimmitude by those who are either cowardly, uninformed or intellectually challenged.
The educational environment should  never have ethnic, religious, racial or political overtones. If it does, it is no longer education. It is blatant indoctrination.

 Sneaking Sharia law has entered U.S. schools by way of banning un-Islamic foods. What’s next? The removing crucifixes and forcing female students to cover their hair?

In the wake of Islamic terrorist attacks throughout the West, strong leaders in countries like Poland and Sweden have begun implementing measures to ensure Muslims either integrate or vacate. However, a U.S. school district has decided that its students need to give up some of their favorite things, in accordance with Sharia law, in order to make offended Muslims feel more at home.

Sweden announced in January that it will expel up to 80,000 asylum seekers over the next few years who crossed its borders illegally. Likewise, after the Brussels terrorist attack, Poland has boldly announced that it will no longer accept the 7,000 Muslim refugees it promised the UN it would welcome. Fortunately, America hasn’t suffered the same devastating effects of mass Islamic migration — unfortunately, that’s why she is still viewing tolerance as a one-way street when it comes to Muslims’ demands.

According to ACT For America, the Kent School District in Washington has announced it will no longer provide non-Muslim students with pork products or anti-Islamic food options during lunchtime, simply because its Muslim students are required by their religion to never ingest it.

When angry parent Dave Brabo heard about the district’s new policy to comply with Sharia and offer Islam-approved foods, he was livid. He called school officials, who only attempted to justify this bias treatment by saying that if they don’t “accommodate the Muslim dietary needs that their federal and state funding would be cut or pulled.”

Outraged that only Muslims’ religion would be favored, forcing everyone to change for their religious requirements, Brado demanded equal treatment for the school’s other religious groups.

Mr. Brabo responded by saying, “I want Kosher food added and labeled, Christian food offered during Lent, and even Hindi food offered.” According to Mr. Brabo, Tom Ogg, Director of Nutritional Services laughed and said, “No.”

Ironically, Brabo was told that the changes were made for physical or cognitive “documented disabilities” and that it had nothing to do with “religious exceptions.” Yet, religious exceptions were exactly what was promoted when the district complied with Islam’s requirement to refrain from consuming pork — a rule that solely applies to the followers of Islam, and not the majority of non-Muslim students.

Bare Naked Islam adds that Ogg, the school’s principal, and two other nutritional service employees told Brabo to “drop it,” and that they were “fearful of reprisal from the School District Administration and that funding would be cut if we didn’t fall in line.”

The district’s final admission to complying and “falling in line” or being punished is a prime example of how Sharia rises in non-Muslim countries. As the Muslim population grows, the democratic process is flipped upside down to reveal that the minority rules.

Academic requirements Getting in the Way of Activism?

"Pity the poor student activists at Ohio’s Oberlin College. As though succeeding in school were not hard enough, these students are facing an impossible dilemma: How can they possibly do well academically when so much of their time must be spent protesting the world’s injustices?"

Yes, you read that correctly. Not only do we need safe spaces, but now course requirements must be eliminated to allow for activism?
Bluntly stating it, far too many of our young people are being turned into mush brained zombies by our elementary/secondary educational system. By the time they enter college,they seem to have forgotten why they have done so.
The college campus is not a safe space refuge which allows unlimited time for the protests of ones choice.
I fear for the future of America and Western Civilization.

College Complaints: School Getting in the Way of Activism
 By shawn

Pity the poor student activists at Ohio’s Oberlin College. As though succeeding in school were not hard enough, these students are facing an impossible dilemma: How can they possibly do well academically when so much of their time must be spent protesting the world’s injustices?

Well, they can’t.

But instead of turning to themselves in a noble effort to put their priorities in order, they are demanding that Oberlin administrators overhaul the college’s education system to meet their special needs. 1,300 students have signed a petition to force the college to do away with bad grades, turn written exams into casual conversations, and provide additional support for their ultra-important social justice battles.

“You know, we’re paying for a service,” one Oberlin student told The New Yorker. “We’re paying for our attendance here. We need to be able to get what we need in a way that we can actually consume it.”

It makes you think of that contact lens commercial where the guy talks about his “special eyes.” Our college campuses are filled to the brim with students who think they have special eyes. Special little needs that must be carefully met. They have become a weird hybrid: Part adult, part baby. At a time in life when humans typically crave independence, these students demand to be coddled.

One student named Zakiya Acey told the New Yorker that the college should not force him to take a written exam. “There’s professors who have openly been like, ‘Yeah, instead of, you know, writing out this midterm, come into my office and you can just speak it,’ right? But that’s not institutionalized,” he lamented. “I have to find that professor.”

There’s this kneejerk tendency to loathe these people, but the first line of this story wasn’t meant sarcastically. These students really do deserve our pity. They are too young and too ignorant to see the cold splash of reality waiting for them in a few short years, if not sooner. They say they want to change the world, but they really want the world to change for them. And if they can’t shake that mindset, their lives are going to be frustrating, angering, and depressing.

But if you can’t muster up any pity, don’t worry about it. They have more than enough of it for themselves.

Source: Total Conservative

Teachers Flock To White Privilege Indoctrination Session, er, Conference

 

For far too long, the white western world has been bullied into bearing the cross of white guilt which symbolizes the responsibility for all of the iniquities of the world. Two big sins, imperialism and slavery are NOT the creation of white western culture.

Both have been endemic to every society since the rise of human civilizations. Thus the question becomes, why do so many fall prey to the white guilt meme? To anyone standing back and looking at the facts, the answer is obvious. The Western World is being manipulated into believing that it alone is responsible for the woes and agonies suffered by all non-western nations past and present. One may ask why. The answer is that in order for the globalists to achieve their goals, the more powerful western world nations must be brought to their knees by any means necessary. More

The following article is a most sickening example of the mass mind manipulation of our educators. They in turn indoctrinate, er, teach our children.
Thousands of teachers flock to ‘White Privilege Conference’  
By Victor Skinner
PHILADELPHIA – Thursday marked the start of “The 17th Annual White Privilege Conference” and this year’s theme is “Let Freedom Ring, Re-Imagining Equality & Social Justice in the United States.”

The annual event is aimed at promoting the theory of White Privilege – that American society is hopelessly stacked against minorities and the only way to fix the system is for white people to acknowledge their immense “privilege” and repent.

“Our vision is to build a community committed to dismantling white privilege, white supremacy and oppression, every day, everywhere,” wrote Eddie Moore Jr., founder and president of “The Privilege Institute,” which organizes the event.

“WPC fosters an environment where every participant can engage deeply, and then through our Accountability program, bring what they have learned back to their own community so that their WPC experience impacts their lives, employment, and community all year long.”

The 2016 theme and Philadelphia location are designed to highlight the main reasons why the White Privilege Institute, and its like-minded attendees at the conference, hate America the most.

“Throughout the history of the United States, ‘liberty’ and ‘justice’ have been espoused values, which have only ever applied to a very small minority of people,” according to a letter to conference participants. “The Constitution supported the enslavement of Africans; the U.S. government orchestrated the decimation of Native American nations; until 1952 Congress prohibited Asians and Latinos from naturalizing as U.S. citizens because they were not White; the Bill of Rights did not apply to persons who were not White, male and Christian.”

The letter also offered a few questions for attendees to ponder during the conference, among them: “What would it look like to have reparations for all injustices committed in the U.S. and for the broken promises of liberty and justice for all?” and “How has Christianity shaped life in the U.S. to the exclusion and oppression of other religions?”

Metro reports 2,500 teachers, school administrators and counselors will attend the conference — the largest attendance to date.

The conference is championed by a radical sect of educators from the organization Rethinking Schools, which promotes the concepts of white privilege and the conference itself to teachers across the country. In 2014, EAGNews.org attended the White Privilege Conference in Madison, Wisconsin to record some of the sessions. More here

Parents To Be Arrested For Walking Kids To School!

Yes, this is a true story!

Holly Ray, principal of Bear Branch Elementary in Magnolia Texas has new rules this year and they are making parents and teachers furious!

Already well known to be an overbearing gestapo, Holly Ray removed the bike rack, and made the new rule at the beginning of the school year and reinforced it in March.
Only way you can get to and from school is in a car or bus! Parents stay in your car! Holly Ray demands!

UPDATE: I got an E-Mail response from Superintendent Todd Stephens, Phd:

“Scott

Didn’t think you sounded like a native Texas… I am afraid your a victim of media hyperbole. “

THAT was it! Ad-Hominem and bad grammar? Really Todd?

TRENDING ON JOEFORAMERICA.COM

He then referred me to his letter released yesterday, April 6th, where he lied and as well deferred to the ramifications as opposed to the real issue.
The big issue is his LIE about only 12 students withdrawing…Open Records caused MISD to release the number 67:

Superintendent Todd Stephens LIED!

Now back to the story! UPDATE OFF!

No more walking, even with a parent, and absolutely no bike riding! AND… Parents are not allowed to even walk on campus with their kids! The are demanded to stay in the car!

Furious yet? Time for mass calls and contact by outraged Americans:

Principal Holly Ray hray@magnoliaisd.org phone (281) 356-4771
Superintendent Dr. Todd Stephens tstephens@magnoliaisd.org (281) 356-3571

Federal Law Now Says Kids Can Walk To School Alone!!!!! Too bad for Holly Ray!

Not only is she an overbearing gestapo who is trampling on parental rights, Holly Ray is BREAKING Federal Law! That is full reason for termination!

Let me explain, Holly Ray. In the Biblical illustration of slavery, YOU are the slave and the parents and the taxpayers are the masters. NOT the other way around.

Red Skelton explained it so easily in his Pledge off Allegiance.

“From the people to the leaders, not the leaders to the people!”

Parents say that not only are students leaving because of it, but teachers and staff are leaving the as well! Yet the District is standing behind her! INSANE!

Fox26Houston reports:
“She’s threatening to arrest people,” says Wendy Jarman about principal, Holly Ray.
“This has happened to many parents,” Jarman says. “They have been cited. They have been threatened, if they step one foot on school property, they will be arrested and charged with who knows what.”
Frank Young has one of those warnings. He also lives close to the school and he also pulled his children out of it. Young says no effort to negotiate a better policy or even hundreds of signatures on a petition got the district to change the policy or bully tactics.
“Mrs. Ray’s policy is implying that a parent doesn’t have the ability or capability to decide what is safest for her children and that the school district does,” Young says. “I disagree.”
The school district responded to Fox26Houston’s request for comment with a statement fully supporting Principal Ray, saying the goal is a safe dismissal process. Holly Ray OBVIOUSLY is ignorant on history as well!

Feds to Fine Schools for Not Following Michelle Obama’s Lunch Rules

In case you missed this.

Proposed reg would punish schools for ‘egregious or persistent disregard’ (emphasis mine) for sodium limits

BY: Elizabeth Harrington 
March 28, 2016: Update Tuesday, March 29 7:23 P.M.: Following publication of this story, a USDA spokesperson told the Washington Free Beacon that the goal of the new proposals are meant to ensure high standards in its Child Nutrition Programs.

“To ensure that entities implementing these critical programs continue to meet high standards of program effectiveness and integrity, USDA is proposing a series of program improvements that address only those programs with systemic and significant program violations, such as theft of funds and financial mismanagement, to safeguard the integrity of Child Nutrition Programs and taxpayer dollars,” the spokesperson said.

The federal government is taking steps to fine schools that do not comply with first lady Michelle Obama’s school lunch rules.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service issued a proposed rule Monday to codify parts of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, which was championed by Mrs. Obama.

The regulation would punish schools and state departments with fines for “egregious or persistent disregard” for the lunch rules that imposed sodium and calorie limits and banned white grains.

A West Virginia preschool teacher was threatened with fines for violating the rules by rewarding her students with candy for good behavior in June 2015. The teacher ultimately did not have to pay, but the school had to develop a “corrective action plan” with training on the policies.

The government now seeks to make fines enforceable by regulation. Section 303 of the law requires that the federal government “establish criteria for the imposition of fines” for all the Department of Agriculture’s child food programs.

“Under section 303, the Secretary or a State agency may establish an assessment against any school food authority or school administering the Child Nutrition Programs if the Secretary or the State agency determines that the school or school food authority failed to correct severe mismanagement of any program, failed to correct repeated violations of program requirements, or disregarded a requirement of which they have been informed,” the proposed rule states.

The Laurance Rockefeller UFO Disclosure Initiative | Official Government Documents

Not sure if this truly belongs in the Dingbat files or not. There have been many credible witnesses regarding UFO sightings. Were these really UFOs from outer space or simply government red herrings enacted to hide the development of secret weapons systems. 
Both sides have been argued.
The following article is quite long but contains a great deal of information
I post, you decide.

The following is a detailed paper discussing official UFO disclosure efforts from the late 20th Century. The information was obtained from a Freedom of Information Request made in January 2001, releasing almost 1000 pages of official government documents.
 
 Contained below is prima facie evidence that the government has known about the existence of UFOs and extraterrestrials for at least the past 70 years. This data can be used to help awaken more close minded individuals to the reality of extraterrestrial activity on Earth. For those who demand evidence that the phenomenon is real, this paper is an excellent resource.

Laurance Rockefeller made a concerted effort, with various high-level government contacts, to officially release all government documentation related to the UFO phenomenon in the late 1990s. His involvement in the disclosure initiative is perplexing, but it is obvious that he was instrumental in alerting certain government officials — who were not briefed in these areas — that the government had been covering up the UFO issue.

As one example, Jack Gibbons, former Science Advisor to the President, was surprised to learn that the government had been withholding information regarding UFOs from the public. Once Gibbins was made aware care of Rockefeller, he and several other high-level officials began a disclosure effort. Steven Greer was participating in briefings to high-level White House staffers, for the purpose of preparing them to disclose to the public. Much of what Greer discusses in his work is summerized below

But despite the initiative successes, no official disclosure came about. And in mid-2001, several months prior to the infamous September 11th terror attacks, Greer held a National Press Club event with dozens of insiders and whistleblowers in a grassroots disclosure effort. That was a seminal event in the push for official disclosure, and since that time, the body of evidence being added to by insiders has expanded greatly.

Given the Rockefeller family's involvement in secret government criminal syndicate activity, especially related to deep black budget government projects, one wonders if this initiative was part of an early limited or partial disclosure effort.

In this brief excerpt from the below report, we see how intimately Rockefeller was involved:
During this February 1994 meeting Gibbons made a stunning proposal related to Rockefeller’s main request that all UFO information be declassified and released. Rockefeller referred to the Gibbons proposal in a follow up letter.

“We believe that your approach of starting by addressing a specific incident is an important and reasonable way to begin the process of declassification in this area.”[x]

It was an opportunity that Rockefeller’s made the most of. He fully encouraged Gibbons to work to declassify Roswell, the “mother of all UFO cases.” Rockefeller wrote,

"The July 1947 Roswell incident would be a logical and challenging place to start. While much in the public sector has been written about it, the government has had nothing to say about it after the original press release saying that a flying disc had been recovered was retracted. The public record of this incident has been thoroughly analyzed. Further information depends upon access to classified information.

Many are convinced that Roswell marks the beginning of government secrecy about UFOs. However, whatever the truth of Roswell, a definite statement about it from the government would be very important. If it actually was UFO related, it could be used to start the process of reversing the government’s 40 plus years of denial on the subject. If it can fully be explained as not UFO related, it would be a significant contribution to the field, and perhaps even contribute to more rigor in research on the subject.

If this specific project initiative is successful, it will become an important prototype for the release of all UFO information. Obviously, the means of carrying out this event-related review is up to you. However, to the extent we can be helpful, we want to be."[xi]

Rockefeller added, “Scott Jones and his associates are quite current on research accomplished on this subject. I have asked that they be available to assist your investigation in any appropriate way.”v

In addition to “lifting classification about Roswell” Rockefeller asked that President Clinton “grant amnesty on an individual basis to allow those with knowledge of the incident to speak without fear of prosecution.”

Finally, Rockefeller asked that Gibbons “designate a staff person for continuing contact.” In the meantime, and under these circumstances, Rockefeller promised that he would hold off on the letter he was drafting addressed to President Clinton.

This “Clinton draft letter” popped up over and over in the 1,000 pages released by OSTP, from this first reference in 1994 to early 1996 when it appeared the letter might have been sent to the President. It appeared attached to Gibbons letters, in various states of draft. In one draft, discussed later, Gibbons or one of his staff actually made comments in the margin about various ideas expressed in the letter.