This Woman Is Seriously ILL!

 Beyond belief!

Hillary Clinton Plotting a 2020 Presidential Campaign?
 According to political author Ed Klein, Hillary Clinton is planning to keep her campaign team intact in preparation for yet another run for the presidency in four years.

“She’s convinced that, sooner than later, the voters will come to their senses and realize they made a horrible mistake by putting Trump in the White House,” a source inside Hillary’s camp told Klein. “She’s sure the voters will beg her to get in the race and she says, ‘I’m going to run again in 2020.’”

NewsMax reports, however, that many of Hillary’s advisors think she’s “in a state of denial.” They say she’s been depressed and drinking excessively since election day and isn’t thinking with a clear head.

“She’s convinced that [FBI Director James] Comey’s last-minute announcement that he was reopening his investigation of Hillary’s emails was planned in advance by her Republican enemies,” a source told Klein. “She’s also convinced that [Russian president Vladimir] Putin was working with Trump and that the two were in direct contact.”

It’s a vast right-wing conspiracy. No, wait, it’s the Russians. No, sorry, it’s Comey. Hold on a minute, it’s fake news on Facebook. By the time Trump takes office, we’ll have John Podesta out there blaming aliens for Hillary’s crushing defeat. Hell, they’re about the only entity that hasn’t been scapegoated yet.

But hey, if she wants to give it another go, Republicans should do everything they can to encourage her. Nothing would ensure a second Trump term more emphatically. Trump described Paul Ryan as aging like a fine wine; the exact opposite could be said of Hillary. The longer she stays in the political spotlight, the less the American people like what they see. She represents everything that is phony, slimy, and corrupt about the government. Her poor decisions as Secretary of State led to tragedy in Benghazi and unimaginable chaos in Syria. Why not make her the Democratic nominee a second time?

Source:    Unfiltered Patriot

Self Hating White Liberals In U.S. And UK Gone Completely Daft

The only thing one can one possibly say regarding the following two articles--"You can't make this up." 

The University of Wisconsin-Madison:
will offer a spring semester class examining “the problem of whiteness” and “what it means to be #woke,” Campus Reform reports.

The course is being offered by the university’s African Cultural Studies department. According to an online description, students will be asked to examine “what it really means to be white,” and consider “how race is experienced by white people” in the United States and abroad.

“Critical Whiteness Studies aims to understand how whiteness is socially constructed and experienced in order to help dismantle white supremacy,” the description reads. “In this class, we will ask what an ethical white identity entails, what it means to be #woke, and consider the journal Race Traitor’s motto, ‘treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.'”

The course will satisfy the university’s “ethnic studies” requirement for graduation, and will be taught by an associate professor whose course load includes a class on “Global Hiphop and Social Justice.” The reading list for “The Problem of Whiteness” course includes Between the World and Me, the acclaimed memoir by Atlantic writer Ta-Nehisi Coates.

The University of Wisconsin has been criticized for its handling of racial issues in the past. Earlier this year, the school launched a controversial program called “Our Wisconsin,” consisting of freshman seminars to examine the appropriate interaction between ethnic groups. Source

Wisconsin has company from across the pond:
 
2016 Is the Year the ‘Diversity’ Agenda Showed Its True, Divisive Colours
Forget Brexit or post-truth politics, if there’s one buzzword that’s come to define 2016 it’s “diversity”. Or rather, the lack of it – especially in plum jobs like the movies, publishing, the City, media and government.

In 2016, the liberal intelligentsia decided: “this privileged world is too male, pale and stale – and it’s time to barrack it into change”. 

Boy Sent Home From School for Having a Boy’s Haircut

 Egad, you cannot make this up....

A boy in Australia was allegedly sent home from school for looking like a boy.
News.com.au reports Jake, a student at Corpus Christi College in Australia, was sent home after his teachers argued his new short haircut could “offend” people.

Jake’s mother, Sandra Fedele, told 6PR’s Gary Adshead, “This morning he went to school on his last day to get his exam results, he’s Year 10, he got told, he text me and said ‘Mum, I’ve been told I have to go home, I’m not allowed to be at school, my hair’s too short.’”

“We had a wedding on the wedding and he got his hair cut. So has his hair cut short on the side and it’s cut just a little long on the top. It’s not even 2 centimeters long on top, so it’s not like it’s a long fringe down to his nose or anything like that. He’s just got a boy’s haircut. Literally a boy’s haircut,” she explained.

When Sandra arrived at school, teachers allegedly told her the haircut violated school rules for being too short and therefore potentially offensive.

Professor Finds That White Students Think America Invented Slavery

Behold, the trees bearing the poisoned fruits of ignorance and bias have been consumed over the past few decades by our young people, and the intended results are being fully realized. 
 
 



by Kate Hardiman - University of Notre Dame

For 11 years, Professor Duke Pesta gave quizzes to his students at the beginning of the school year to test their knowledge on basic facts about American history and Western culture.

The most surprising result from his 11-year experiment? Students’ overwhelming belief that slavery began in the United States and was almost exclusively an American phenomenon, he said.

“Most of my students could not tell me anything meaningful about slavery outside of America,” Pesta told The College Fix. “They are convinced that slavery was an American problem that more or less ended with the Civil War, and they are very fuzzy about the history of slavery prior to the Colonial era. Their entire education about slavery was confined to America.”

Pesta, currently an associate professor of English at the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, has taught the gamut of Western literature—from the Classics to the modern—at seven different universities, ranging from large research institutions to small liberal arts colleges to branch campuses. He said he has given the quizzes to students at Purdue University, University of Tennessee Martin, Ursinus College, Oklahoma State University, and University of Wisconsin Oshkosh.

The origin of these quizzes, which Pesta calls “cultural literacy markers,” was his increasing discomfort with gaps in his students’ foundational knowledge.

“They came to college without the basic rudiments of American history or Western culture and their reading level was pretty low,” Pesta told The Fix.

This Art History Secret Suggests Hillary Clinton’s Health Is Worse Than We Thought

Readers, take this one anyway you want.....

BY: Blake Seitz

Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has been plagued by questions about her health. Those questions intensified after she collapsed in New York City in mid-September and then took several days off from campaigning to recover from pneumonia. Is Hillary OK? Does she have dysphasia, as Katrina Pierson, M.D., has suggested? Does she require an old person’s walker, an advanced exoskeleton, or an elaborate system of pulleys and wires to move, as other experts have suggested? Why does she ride in SUVs with “like almost a little step that comes down,” AKA retractable running boards?

The answer to all these questions may be contained in clues from an esoteric corner of the art world.

Americans were seriously weirded out when a fly landed on Hillary Clinton’s face at last night’s debate.

Fly Lands On Clinton’s Face During Debate (Full Report: https://t.co/8VYD6nM5eT ) https://t.co/i1j6cdLTAy #debatefly #Debate

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) October 10, 2016

Observers pointed to Clinton’s understated reaction to the fly as evidence that she is a robot, like those on the HBO show Westworld. The incident revived basic concerns about Hillary’s status as a member of the species homo sapiens—which she unsuccessfully tried to quash in 2015.

Anyone notice how Clinton didn’t flinch when the fly landed on her? Anyone watch Westworld? They don’t flinch either. THE ROBOTS ARE HERE

— William/Bill Aicher (@BillAicher) October 10, 2016

However, let us stipulate for a second that Hillary is in fact one of us. If we do, then her health may be even more precarious than we thought. As learned observers know, flies serve an important symbolic role in Western art.

UA students 'fear for their safety' over Milo supporters

Egad...

by Amber Athey  
Investigative Reporter

University of Alabama students complained about having to “adjust their schedules” in order to avoid Milo Yiannopoulos supporters, and demanded the school to rescind funding for Milo’s security.

Starting Monday morning, UA protesters flooded the president’s office with three demands in response to a racist incident on campus, as well as the planned appearance of Milo Yiannopoulos that evening, according to The Crimson White.

“Students...fear for their safety because...there will be students on campus that support Milo."

In light of Milo’s visit, the protesters demanded that university visitors comply with the Student Code of Conduct in order to avoid making students feel “unsafe.”

[RELATED: Students worry free speech will make U of M ‘an unsafe place’]

“Anyone on campus, regardless of their affiliation with UA… if they’re on campus, and they’re reserving space to speak or host an event, then they must abide by the Capstone Creed and the code of conduct that we tuition-paying students must comply with,” David Swayne, a UA sophomore, told The Crimson White. “We feel that Milo represents hate speech.”

The protesters claimed that merely knowing that Milo supporters were on campus compelled them to change their schedules so they could avoid anything that would “put [them] at jeopardy.”

“Students have to adjust their schedules… they fear for their safety because… there will be students on campus that support Milo, but there are also going to be his supporters who are not members of our community," said Maya Perry. "They don’t have to adhere to our code of conduct, they can act however they want, and they can put these students at jeopardy."

Past Milo events have required heavy security due to the high volume of protesters, with several even being cancelled due to the “security concerns.” At DePaul University, Breitbart covered a $1,000 security fee, but security guards failed to stop protesters from storming the stage and ruining the event anyway.

[RELATED: Milo demands DePaul refund security cash after its guards did nothing]

In this case, UA hit the College Republicans with a $7,000 charge for event security—nearly seven times an initial estimate—but caved after a meeting with the organizers of the event and agreed to cover the outrageous fee.

“The goal all along has been to make sure they have a successful event. To that end, the College Republicans will not incur any expense for UAPD security,” Chris Bryant, the interim director of the University of Alabama’s Office of Media Relations said in a statement. “The University of Alabama supports free speech and welcomes diverse speakers to our campus. As with all speakers, the views of Mr. Yiannopoulos do not necessarily reflect the views of the university.”

Nonetheless, UA protesters demanded the university rescind the contribution, arguing that the College Republicans should not have invited Milo to speak in the first place because he is “insulting.”

“I think that other organizations on campus take care to respect certain groups on campus just to make sure that they invite speakers who are not going to directly insult anyone’s existence as is,” Perry said. "I think it’s very irresponsible of the College Republicans to invite someone like this to speak knowing how insulting he is to certain marginalized people on campus.”

The protesters’ final demand was for the university to expel Ryan Parrish, a student who made racial threats on social media, arguing that an indefinite suspension and removal from campus was not a harsh enough punishment.

“Ryan Parrish [should] be expelled from the university indefinitely,” Perry said. “We already know that he has been removed from campus and that he is un-enrolled, but I don’t think that many of us believe that punishment is severe enough.”   

Source:   Campus Reform

A change of the newscycle pace: Are E.Ts avoiding Earth?

File photo - Crystal Graham, wearing an extra-terrestrial costume, waits in line for her turn in the UFO costume contest in Roswell (Reuters)

Time for some comic (maybe not) relief....

Are aliens avoiding Earth?
 
By Walt Bonner Published September 23, 2016
Even with all of the advancements in modern technology, we still haven’t made contact with intelligent life on other planets. But what if our attempts to communicate have been ignored?

In 1973, a radio astronomer named John Ball came up with a possible theory as to why aliens – if they do exist – haven’t gotten back to us. Ball’s “Zoo Hypothesis” as it came to be known, posits that alien civilizations exist, and the most highly developed of them have been communicating. This elite alien “club” has come upon a mutual agreement to leave those deemed primitive or “lesser” life forms alone, only to be watched from a distance. Earthlings, therefore, did not make the cut with the galactic cool kids.

So assuming these aliens exist, under what circumstances could they all agree to keep us in the dark? A Scottish astronomer named Duncan Forgan has the answer.

“I was interested in this theory because it is so difficult to test in a scientific fashion,” Forgan told FoxNews.com. “The Zoo Hypothesis relies on us being unable to observe other aliens, so a failure to observe aliens can be used both as evidence for and against the hypothesis at the same time!”
Related:

UFO over St. Louis? Strange light over Gateway Arch sparks debate
Strange 'burning' object spotted in sky over western US
Alien contact could be 1,500 years away, say Cornell astronomers
A UFO? Video captures strange object near Ohio military base

Forgan decided to test the assumptions that make up the hypothesis, instead of the hypothesis itself. One of these assumptions is that intelligent extraterrestrials can agree on a “no contact with primitive worlds” policy.

“Agreement requires communication, which is limited by the speed of light,” Forgan explained.

This would assume that civilizations must have existed long enough for messages to go back and forth between them, a process limited by the speed of light. Another assumption is that life would be able to thrive in a galaxy–wide habitable zone. Forgan entered these assumptions into a computer program, which then went about simulating civilizations and randomly placing them around the habitable zone, measuring the distance between them and calculating the likelihood of any two of them making contact and communicating within their lifetimes.

The computer found that for a "leave the Earthlings alone" agreement to be likely, at least 500 civilizations must exist, each of them having lasted over one million years. Any less than 500 civilizations and there are too many groups of civilizations to form a pact; if any one civilization lasted less than a million years, then there are also too many civilization groups to form the galactic club. (A “civilization group,” Forgan explained, is “a collection of civilizations that are ‘culturally connected’, which basically means that a civilization is aware of the others in the group as soon as it is technologically ready. Weirdly, the civilization groups are actually pretty well-mixed in space, which you wouldn't expect naively - the issue is their separation in space-time, not their separation in space.”)

In other words, Earth may not be in the universal doghouse after all. 

How's he gonna do that? Gov. Jerry Brown helps to save planet by regulating cow flatulence & manure

Yes, this is real.

By Doug Powers • September 20, 2016 07:37 PM

"Many more California dairy farmers will be blaming the dog for their cows’ farts thanks to progs in state government hell-bent to make everything more expensive in the name of fighting “climate change”:

Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill Monday that regulates for the first time greenhouse-gas emissions tied to dairy cows and landfills, an escalation of California’s efforts to fight climate change beyond carbon-based gases to include methane and other pollutants.

The move by the Democratic governor targets a category of gases known as short-lived climate pollutants, which have an outsize effect on global warming despite their relatively short life in the atmosphere. Environmentalists hope that tackling short-lived pollutants now would buy time to develop new and more affordable technology to reduce carbon emissions.

The legislation will require steep reductions in a variety of pollutants, including methane; HFC gases used in aerosols and air conditioning refrigerants; and soot, known as black carbon. It’s tied to $90 million in funding for the dairy industry and garbage collectors.

“This bill curbs these dangerous pollutants and thereby protects public health and slows climate change,” Brown said in a statement."

Oh my! The Mahdi Will Return In A Space Ship--- Sort Of

Ayatollah: Mahdi coming back in spaceship!
by Bob Unruh

A prominent Iranian ayatollah says the Mahdi, the end-times Muslim savior, will come back in a spaceship with the sound “of thunder and its power and speed is that of lightning.”

Actually, his recent explanation wasn’t completely clear.

“It is like a spaceship and like other swift and amazing space vessels that are found [only] in stories today, but nobody knows how close [these vessels] come to truth and reality. Maybe it will be like [a spaceship] but in any case it is not a spaceship,” he said.

His description was discovered in an Iranian news report by the Middle East Media Research Institute, which monitors and analyzes media reports in the region.

The comments came from Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi, who operates his own website to promote his views.

He was responding to a question about the “arrival of the Mahdi – the Hidden Imam who is the equivalent of the Messiah in Shiite Islam,” MEMRI reported.

“He explained at length how the Mahdi’s arrival will be high-tech, as befits the modern age,” MEMRI said.

His comments included:
“It was said by Imam Sadegh [the sixth Shiite imam, circa. 700–765 C.E.]: ‘When our Lord arrives, the land will be illuminated by divine light, and [God’s] creations will no longer require sunlight.’ The interpretation of this saying is that the issue of light and energy is expressed in that both in daytime and nighttime powerful lights can replace sunlight.”

“Today we use satellites [and by means of them] cover extensive areas, so that anyone with a receiver can use them… In the time of the Mahdi’s arrival, there will be a powerful apparatus, that may be difficult for us to imagine today, for transmitting images so that the entire world is visible like the palm of a hand. Without worldwide control by an intelligence [apparatus], there can be no unified global regime [as foretold that there will be when the Mahdi arrives], and no peace, security, and decency… Therefore, God grants him this tool… Once again I stress that this is a routine matter, and that it is inconceivable that it will come about based on a miracle; rather [it will come about] by means of ordinary tools that are based on scientific and industrial advances.”

Will Someone In Authority Please Muzzle Nutty Uncle Joe?

Remember this one?

KUHNER: The betrayal of the Navy’s SEAL Team 6
How they were ‘outed’ to assist Obama’s re-election campaign

Navy SEAL Team 6 became a household name for their role in killing Osama bin Laden. On May 1, 2011, the country rightly celebrated the death of bin Laden. The Obama administration, however, wanted to do more. It sought to claim full credit for the assassination, deciding to spike the football. On May 3, at an event in Washington, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. did the unthinkable: He publicly revealed the identity of the special-operations unit responsible for bin Laden’s killing. His reckless action put at risk the lives of every member of SEAL Team 6. The Taliban and other jihadists eager to avenge bin Laden now knew which unit to target. Stunned and shocked, SEAL members immediately realized they were going to be hunted by al Qaeda sympathizers.

Remember how everyone was aghast that at the outing of our most secret and elite team for everyone to see?

Now, we have this gem: 

Vice President Joe Biden revealed during a campaign rally that he had a military aide with the nuclear codes present at the event.
by Charlie Spiering15 Aug 20161043

AG Lynch: Compassion and Love Are Best Response to Terror

 

Egad.  Too much wacky tobaccy?

Posted by Aleister

It should come as a surprise to no one that under Obama, the nation’s top law enforcement officer sounds more like a high school guidance counselor than a prosecutor.

The victims of a terror attack certainly deserve love and compassion but for an attorney general to say this is the best response to terror doesn’t inspire much confidence.

David Rutz of the Washington Free Beacon reported:
 
Lynch: Best Response to Terrorism Is Love and Compassion
Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that love and compassion are the best responses to terrorism during remarks to the media in Orlando, Florida on Tuesday.

Lynch said the Department of Justice stood in solidarity with the LGBT community “in the light” following a Muslim terrorist’s massacre of 49 people at a gay nightclub last week.

“We stand with you to say that the good in this world far outweighs the evil, that our common humanity transcends our differences, and that our most effective response to terror and to hatred is compassion, it’s unity, and it’s love,” Lynch said. “We stand with you today as we grieve together, and long after the cameras are gone, we will continue to stand with you as we grow together in commitment, in solidarity, and in equality.”

Lynch has been in the news for defending the administration’s decision to redact transcripts between law enforcement and the terrorist, Omar Mateen, during his attack. 

U.S. School Bans Some Of Students’ Favorite Items Because It Offends Muslims

Eliminating ANYTHING from our culture because it offends Muslims is sheer dhimmitude by those who are either cowardly, uninformed or intellectually challenged.
The educational environment should  never have ethnic, religious, racial or political overtones. If it does, it is no longer education. It is blatant indoctrination.

 Sneaking Sharia law has entered U.S. schools by way of banning un-Islamic foods. What’s next? The removing crucifixes and forcing female students to cover their hair?

In the wake of Islamic terrorist attacks throughout the West, strong leaders in countries like Poland and Sweden have begun implementing measures to ensure Muslims either integrate or vacate. However, a U.S. school district has decided that its students need to give up some of their favorite things, in accordance with Sharia law, in order to make offended Muslims feel more at home.

Sweden announced in January that it will expel up to 80,000 asylum seekers over the next few years who crossed its borders illegally. Likewise, after the Brussels terrorist attack, Poland has boldly announced that it will no longer accept the 7,000 Muslim refugees it promised the UN it would welcome. Fortunately, America hasn’t suffered the same devastating effects of mass Islamic migration — unfortunately, that’s why she is still viewing tolerance as a one-way street when it comes to Muslims’ demands.

According to ACT For America, the Kent School District in Washington has announced it will no longer provide non-Muslim students with pork products or anti-Islamic food options during lunchtime, simply because its Muslim students are required by their religion to never ingest it.

When angry parent Dave Brabo heard about the district’s new policy to comply with Sharia and offer Islam-approved foods, he was livid. He called school officials, who only attempted to justify this bias treatment by saying that if they don’t “accommodate the Muslim dietary needs that their federal and state funding would be cut or pulled.”

Outraged that only Muslims’ religion would be favored, forcing everyone to change for their religious requirements, Brado demanded equal treatment for the school’s other religious groups.

Mr. Brabo responded by saying, “I want Kosher food added and labeled, Christian food offered during Lent, and even Hindi food offered.” According to Mr. Brabo, Tom Ogg, Director of Nutritional Services laughed and said, “No.”

Ironically, Brabo was told that the changes were made for physical or cognitive “documented disabilities” and that it had nothing to do with “religious exceptions.” Yet, religious exceptions were exactly what was promoted when the district complied with Islam’s requirement to refrain from consuming pork — a rule that solely applies to the followers of Islam, and not the majority of non-Muslim students.

Bare Naked Islam adds that Ogg, the school’s principal, and two other nutritional service employees told Brabo to “drop it,” and that they were “fearful of reprisal from the School District Administration and that funding would be cut if we didn’t fall in line.”

The district’s final admission to complying and “falling in line” or being punished is a prime example of how Sharia rises in non-Muslim countries. As the Muslim population grows, the democratic process is flipped upside down to reveal that the minority rules.

Academic requirements Getting in the Way of Activism?

"Pity the poor student activists at Ohio’s Oberlin College. As though succeeding in school were not hard enough, these students are facing an impossible dilemma: How can they possibly do well academically when so much of their time must be spent protesting the world’s injustices?"

Yes, you read that correctly. Not only do we need safe spaces, but now course requirements must be eliminated to allow for activism?
Bluntly stating it, far too many of our young people are being turned into mush brained zombies by our elementary/secondary educational system. By the time they enter college,they seem to have forgotten why they have done so.
The college campus is not a safe space refuge which allows unlimited time for the protests of ones choice.
I fear for the future of America and Western Civilization.

College Complaints: School Getting in the Way of Activism
 By shawn

Pity the poor student activists at Ohio’s Oberlin College. As though succeeding in school were not hard enough, these students are facing an impossible dilemma: How can they possibly do well academically when so much of their time must be spent protesting the world’s injustices?

Well, they can’t.

But instead of turning to themselves in a noble effort to put their priorities in order, they are demanding that Oberlin administrators overhaul the college’s education system to meet their special needs. 1,300 students have signed a petition to force the college to do away with bad grades, turn written exams into casual conversations, and provide additional support for their ultra-important social justice battles.

“You know, we’re paying for a service,” one Oberlin student told The New Yorker. “We’re paying for our attendance here. We need to be able to get what we need in a way that we can actually consume it.”

It makes you think of that contact lens commercial where the guy talks about his “special eyes.” Our college campuses are filled to the brim with students who think they have special eyes. Special little needs that must be carefully met. They have become a weird hybrid: Part adult, part baby. At a time in life when humans typically crave independence, these students demand to be coddled.

One student named Zakiya Acey told the New Yorker that the college should not force him to take a written exam. “There’s professors who have openly been like, ‘Yeah, instead of, you know, writing out this midterm, come into my office and you can just speak it,’ right? But that’s not institutionalized,” he lamented. “I have to find that professor.”

There’s this kneejerk tendency to loathe these people, but the first line of this story wasn’t meant sarcastically. These students really do deserve our pity. They are too young and too ignorant to see the cold splash of reality waiting for them in a few short years, if not sooner. They say they want to change the world, but they really want the world to change for them. And if they can’t shake that mindset, their lives are going to be frustrating, angering, and depressing.

But if you can’t muster up any pity, don’t worry about it. They have more than enough of it for themselves.

Source: Total Conservative

Teachers Flock To White Privilege Indoctrination Session, er, Conference

 

For far too long, the white western world has been bullied into bearing the cross of white guilt which symbolizes the responsibility for all of the iniquities of the world. Two big sins, imperialism and slavery are NOT the creation of white western culture.

Both have been endemic to every society since the rise of human civilizations. Thus the question becomes, why do so many fall prey to the white guilt meme? To anyone standing back and looking at the facts, the answer is obvious. The Western World is being manipulated into believing that it alone is responsible for the woes and agonies suffered by all non-western nations past and present. One may ask why. The answer is that in order for the globalists to achieve their goals, the more powerful western world nations must be brought to their knees by any means necessary. More

The following article is a most sickening example of the mass mind manipulation of our educators. They in turn indoctrinate, er, teach our children.
Thousands of teachers flock to ‘White Privilege Conference’  
By Victor Skinner
PHILADELPHIA – Thursday marked the start of “The 17th Annual White Privilege Conference” and this year’s theme is “Let Freedom Ring, Re-Imagining Equality & Social Justice in the United States.”

The annual event is aimed at promoting the theory of White Privilege – that American society is hopelessly stacked against minorities and the only way to fix the system is for white people to acknowledge their immense “privilege” and repent.

“Our vision is to build a community committed to dismantling white privilege, white supremacy and oppression, every day, everywhere,” wrote Eddie Moore Jr., founder and president of “The Privilege Institute,” which organizes the event.

“WPC fosters an environment where every participant can engage deeply, and then through our Accountability program, bring what they have learned back to their own community so that their WPC experience impacts their lives, employment, and community all year long.”

The 2016 theme and Philadelphia location are designed to highlight the main reasons why the White Privilege Institute, and its like-minded attendees at the conference, hate America the most.

“Throughout the history of the United States, ‘liberty’ and ‘justice’ have been espoused values, which have only ever applied to a very small minority of people,” according to a letter to conference participants. “The Constitution supported the enslavement of Africans; the U.S. government orchestrated the decimation of Native American nations; until 1952 Congress prohibited Asians and Latinos from naturalizing as U.S. citizens because they were not White; the Bill of Rights did not apply to persons who were not White, male and Christian.”

The letter also offered a few questions for attendees to ponder during the conference, among them: “What would it look like to have reparations for all injustices committed in the U.S. and for the broken promises of liberty and justice for all?” and “How has Christianity shaped life in the U.S. to the exclusion and oppression of other religions?”

Metro reports 2,500 teachers, school administrators and counselors will attend the conference — the largest attendance to date.

The conference is championed by a radical sect of educators from the organization Rethinking Schools, which promotes the concepts of white privilege and the conference itself to teachers across the country. In 2014, EAGNews.org attended the White Privilege Conference in Madison, Wisconsin to record some of the sessions. More here

Parents To Be Arrested For Walking Kids To School!

Yes, this is a true story!

Holly Ray, principal of Bear Branch Elementary in Magnolia Texas has new rules this year and they are making parents and teachers furious!

Already well known to be an overbearing gestapo, Holly Ray removed the bike rack, and made the new rule at the beginning of the school year and reinforced it in March.
Only way you can get to and from school is in a car or bus! Parents stay in your car! Holly Ray demands!

UPDATE: I got an E-Mail response from Superintendent Todd Stephens, Phd:

“Scott

Didn’t think you sounded like a native Texas… I am afraid your a victim of media hyperbole. “

THAT was it! Ad-Hominem and bad grammar? Really Todd?

TRENDING ON JOEFORAMERICA.COM

He then referred me to his letter released yesterday, April 6th, where he lied and as well deferred to the ramifications as opposed to the real issue.
The big issue is his LIE about only 12 students withdrawing…Open Records caused MISD to release the number 67:

Superintendent Todd Stephens LIED!

Now back to the story! UPDATE OFF!

No more walking, even with a parent, and absolutely no bike riding! AND… Parents are not allowed to even walk on campus with their kids! The are demanded to stay in the car!

Furious yet? Time for mass calls and contact by outraged Americans:

Principal Holly Ray hray@magnoliaisd.org phone (281) 356-4771
Superintendent Dr. Todd Stephens tstephens@magnoliaisd.org (281) 356-3571

Federal Law Now Says Kids Can Walk To School Alone!!!!! Too bad for Holly Ray!

Not only is she an overbearing gestapo who is trampling on parental rights, Holly Ray is BREAKING Federal Law! That is full reason for termination!

Let me explain, Holly Ray. In the Biblical illustration of slavery, YOU are the slave and the parents and the taxpayers are the masters. NOT the other way around.

Red Skelton explained it so easily in his Pledge off Allegiance.

“From the people to the leaders, not the leaders to the people!”

Parents say that not only are students leaving because of it, but teachers and staff are leaving the as well! Yet the District is standing behind her! INSANE!

Fox26Houston reports:
“She’s threatening to arrest people,” says Wendy Jarman about principal, Holly Ray.
“This has happened to many parents,” Jarman says. “They have been cited. They have been threatened, if they step one foot on school property, they will be arrested and charged with who knows what.”
Frank Young has one of those warnings. He also lives close to the school and he also pulled his children out of it. Young says no effort to negotiate a better policy or even hundreds of signatures on a petition got the district to change the policy or bully tactics.
“Mrs. Ray’s policy is implying that a parent doesn’t have the ability or capability to decide what is safest for her children and that the school district does,” Young says. “I disagree.”
The school district responded to Fox26Houston’s request for comment with a statement fully supporting Principal Ray, saying the goal is a safe dismissal process. Holly Ray OBVIOUSLY is ignorant on history as well!

Feds to Fine Schools for Not Following Michelle Obama’s Lunch Rules

In case you missed this.

Proposed reg would punish schools for ‘egregious or persistent disregard’ (emphasis mine) for sodium limits

BY: Elizabeth Harrington 
March 28, 2016: Update Tuesday, March 29 7:23 P.M.: Following publication of this story, a USDA spokesperson told the Washington Free Beacon that the goal of the new proposals are meant to ensure high standards in its Child Nutrition Programs.

“To ensure that entities implementing these critical programs continue to meet high standards of program effectiveness and integrity, USDA is proposing a series of program improvements that address only those programs with systemic and significant program violations, such as theft of funds and financial mismanagement, to safeguard the integrity of Child Nutrition Programs and taxpayer dollars,” the spokesperson said.

The federal government is taking steps to fine schools that do not comply with first lady Michelle Obama’s school lunch rules.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service issued a proposed rule Monday to codify parts of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, which was championed by Mrs. Obama.

The regulation would punish schools and state departments with fines for “egregious or persistent disregard” for the lunch rules that imposed sodium and calorie limits and banned white grains.

A West Virginia preschool teacher was threatened with fines for violating the rules by rewarding her students with candy for good behavior in June 2015. The teacher ultimately did not have to pay, but the school had to develop a “corrective action plan” with training on the policies.

The government now seeks to make fines enforceable by regulation. Section 303 of the law requires that the federal government “establish criteria for the imposition of fines” for all the Department of Agriculture’s child food programs.

“Under section 303, the Secretary or a State agency may establish an assessment against any school food authority or school administering the Child Nutrition Programs if the Secretary or the State agency determines that the school or school food authority failed to correct severe mismanagement of any program, failed to correct repeated violations of program requirements, or disregarded a requirement of which they have been informed,” the proposed rule states.

The Laurance Rockefeller UFO Disclosure Initiative | Official Government Documents

Not sure if this truly belongs in the Dingbat files or not. There have been many credible witnesses regarding UFO sightings. Were these really UFOs from outer space or simply government red herrings enacted to hide the development of secret weapons systems. 
Both sides have been argued.
The following article is quite long but contains a great deal of information
I post, you decide.

The following is a detailed paper discussing official UFO disclosure efforts from the late 20th Century. The information was obtained from a Freedom of Information Request made in January 2001, releasing almost 1000 pages of official government documents.
 
 Contained below is prima facie evidence that the government has known about the existence of UFOs and extraterrestrials for at least the past 70 years. This data can be used to help awaken more close minded individuals to the reality of extraterrestrial activity on Earth. For those who demand evidence that the phenomenon is real, this paper is an excellent resource.

Laurance Rockefeller made a concerted effort, with various high-level government contacts, to officially release all government documentation related to the UFO phenomenon in the late 1990s. His involvement in the disclosure initiative is perplexing, but it is obvious that he was instrumental in alerting certain government officials — who were not briefed in these areas — that the government had been covering up the UFO issue.

As one example, Jack Gibbons, former Science Advisor to the President, was surprised to learn that the government had been withholding information regarding UFOs from the public. Once Gibbins was made aware care of Rockefeller, he and several other high-level officials began a disclosure effort. Steven Greer was participating in briefings to high-level White House staffers, for the purpose of preparing them to disclose to the public. Much of what Greer discusses in his work is summerized below

But despite the initiative successes, no official disclosure came about. And in mid-2001, several months prior to the infamous September 11th terror attacks, Greer held a National Press Club event with dozens of insiders and whistleblowers in a grassroots disclosure effort. That was a seminal event in the push for official disclosure, and since that time, the body of evidence being added to by insiders has expanded greatly.

Given the Rockefeller family's involvement in secret government criminal syndicate activity, especially related to deep black budget government projects, one wonders if this initiative was part of an early limited or partial disclosure effort.

In this brief excerpt from the below report, we see how intimately Rockefeller was involved:
During this February 1994 meeting Gibbons made a stunning proposal related to Rockefeller’s main request that all UFO information be declassified and released. Rockefeller referred to the Gibbons proposal in a follow up letter.

“We believe that your approach of starting by addressing a specific incident is an important and reasonable way to begin the process of declassification in this area.”[x]

It was an opportunity that Rockefeller’s made the most of. He fully encouraged Gibbons to work to declassify Roswell, the “mother of all UFO cases.” Rockefeller wrote,

"The July 1947 Roswell incident would be a logical and challenging place to start. While much in the public sector has been written about it, the government has had nothing to say about it after the original press release saying that a flying disc had been recovered was retracted. The public record of this incident has been thoroughly analyzed. Further information depends upon access to classified information.

Many are convinced that Roswell marks the beginning of government secrecy about UFOs. However, whatever the truth of Roswell, a definite statement about it from the government would be very important. If it actually was UFO related, it could be used to start the process of reversing the government’s 40 plus years of denial on the subject. If it can fully be explained as not UFO related, it would be a significant contribution to the field, and perhaps even contribute to more rigor in research on the subject.

If this specific project initiative is successful, it will become an important prototype for the release of all UFO information. Obviously, the means of carrying out this event-related review is up to you. However, to the extent we can be helpful, we want to be."[xi]

Rockefeller added, “Scott Jones and his associates are quite current on research accomplished on this subject. I have asked that they be available to assist your investigation in any appropriate way.”v

In addition to “lifting classification about Roswell” Rockefeller asked that President Clinton “grant amnesty on an individual basis to allow those with knowledge of the incident to speak without fear of prosecution.”

Finally, Rockefeller asked that Gibbons “designate a staff person for continuing contact.” In the meantime, and under these circumstances, Rockefeller promised that he would hold off on the letter he was drafting addressed to President Clinton.

This “Clinton draft letter” popped up over and over in the 1,000 pages released by OSTP, from this first reference in 1994 to early 1996 when it appeared the letter might have been sent to the President. It appeared attached to Gibbons letters, in various states of draft. In one draft, discussed later, Gibbons or one of his staff actually made comments in the margin about various ideas expressed in the letter.

Tennessee Rep: Let ISIS Recruit College Students

In case you missed this one!
From The Tennessean:

Speaking on behalf of a bill centered around free speech, a Knoxville-based lawmaker on Wednesday said a terrorist organization should be allowed to recruit on college campuses in Tennessee.

While presenting a billed dubbed the “Tennessee Student Free Speech Protection Act,” Rep. Martin Daniel, R-Knoxville, fielded a question from Rep. John DeBerry Jr., D-Memphis, about whether he believed ISIS should be able to stand in the middle of university campuses and “recruit for ISIS.”

“Yes,” Daniel replied. “So long as it doesn’t disrupt the proceedings on that campus. Yes sir. They can recruit people for any other organization or any other cause. I think it’s just part of being exposed to differing viewpoints.”
More

From  Unfiltered Patriot:
Is there any limit to the idiocy of our elected representatives? Every day, you read something that makes you realize how much truth there is to Donald Trump’s assertion that our lawmakers have absolutely no idea what they’re doing. And it’s not just limited to Democrats, either. Look at Knoxville, Tennessee, where a Republican representative named Martin Daniel thinks that free speech should mean giving Islamic terrorists access to college students.
Defending his “Tennessee Student Free Speech Protection Act,” Daniel was asked if terrorists should be able to go to college campuses and “recruit for ISIS.”

“Yes,” Daniel said. “So long as it doesn’t disrupt the proceedings on that campus. Yes sir. They can recruit people for any other organization or any other cause. I think it’s just part of being exposed to differing viewpoints.”

Oh, right, right. Differing viewpoints. That’s what college is for. Come get your degree, dabble in some Chomsky, make a gay friend, and join ISIS. It’s all part of the experience, maaan.

Daniel was challenged by a Democrat, who said that this wasn’t about protests and free love. “There are young people who are not ready yet – they’re half-baked, half-cooked – who are recruited to work against their own parents, their own nation, and I would be concerned as a parent and as a citizen. Free speech is one thing; being stupid is another.”

Obama: Climate Change Greater Threat Than ISIS

Is Obama the destroyer, or is he in La La Land.
This sums up one(?) of his greatest flaws as a president. He has always blindly, (or deliberately) put his left wing ideology before everything. Even America’s national security comes second.
Agenda 21 alive, well, and barreling down the road of tyranny courtesy of BHO. Never mind the negative impact upon untold numbers of the residents that occupy planet earth--provided ISIS does not get them first.

“OBAMA: I’m more worried about climate change than ISIS,” by Rob Wile, Fusion, March 10, 2016:

In a new interview published in The Atlantic magazine, President Obama says he is more worried about climate change than the terrorist group ISIS.

“ISIS is not an existential threat to the United States,” he told Atlantic correspondent Jeffrey Goldberg. “Climate change is a potential existential threat to the entire world if we don’t do something about it.”

Climate change is particularly worrisome, Obama said, because “it is a political problem perfectly designed to repel government intervention. It involves every single country, and it is a comparatively slow-moving emergency, so there is always something seemingly more urgent on the agenda.”

And climate change is probably helping fuel groups like ISIS, he said.

“Right now, across the globe, you’re seeing places that are undergoing severe stress because of globalization, because of the collision of cultures brought about by the Internet and social media, because of scarcities—some of which will be attributable to climate change over the next several decades—because of population growth,” Obama said. “And in those places, the Middle East being Exhibit A, the default position for a lot of folks is to organize tightly in the tribe and to push back or strike out against those who are different.”

Climate change will also likely create new refugee problems as arable land becomes more scarce.

“If you start seeing more severe drought; more significant famine; more displacement from the Indian subcontinent and coastal regions in Africa and Asia; the continuing problems of scarcity, refugees, poverty, disease—this makes every other problem we’ve got worse,” he said. “That’s above and beyond just the existential issues of a planet that starts getting into a bad feedback loop.”

While the Democratic candidates for president have pledged to continue Obama’s legacy fighting climate change, Republican candidates have shown no interest in tackling the problem. Donald Trump recently told radio host Hugh Hewitt that climate change is, “a problem that I don’t think in any major fashion exists,” while Ted Cruz has called climate change “a religion” and “not science.”

Obama continues to press on with initiatives to address climate change; Thursday, he is expected to announce a new pact with Canada to cut methane emissions and protect remote communities and ecologically sensitive marine areas in the Arctic….

Of interest:

Muslim US Air Force veteran convicted of attempting to join Islamic State

Trump: "I think Islam hates us"

Source: Jihad Watch

Democrats demand government-funded lawyers for illegals

Egad....

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times -

Top Senate Democrats announced legislation Thursday to grant government-funded lawyers to tens of thousands of illegal immigrant children and mothers who surged into the U.S. from Central America over the last few years, opening another front in the thorny immigration battle.

Arguing the Obama administration has been unfair to illegal immigrants by shunting them through a complex legal system without proper attention to their rights, Sen. Harry Reid, the top Democrat in the upper chamber, led colleagues in demanding lawyers and other protections, such as allowing migrants to delay their trials until they get access to their entire government file.

Currently, migrants are able to hire their own lawyers, but the government cannot pay for them.

Though unlikely to advance in the GOP-controlled Congress, the legislation is an important marker for both the presidential campaign and for the ongoing debate over how the U.S. treats the illegal immigrants — and, particularly, the unaccompanied children — that have skyrocketed in recent years.

“Look, deportation means death for some of these people,” Mr. Reid said. “Given the life-and-death consequences of deportation to this region, we must ensure that we are not putting asylum-seeking women and children in harm’s way. We can do this by making sure that these desperate women and children have a lawyer.”

The move by Democrats, including the lone Hispanic Democratic, Sen. Robert Menendez, puts pressure on a White House that has struggled to walk a middle line on immigration, trying to find a lenient policy for those already in the U.S. while still attempting to enforce laws against newcomers.

On Thursday Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, delivering a “state of homeland security” address, said they’re still trying to manage the tricky situation on the border, which has seen about 300,000 illegal immigrant families and children traveling alone stream into the U.S. over the last two and a half years.

Mr. Johnson had thought he had the problem licked in the summer of 2014, only to see a new, unexpected surge in the last half of 2015. Mr. Johnson said so far in 2016, the numbers are down again, by more than 50 percent compared to December.

Chef Forced to Remove Menu Item After Getting DEATH THREATS FROM VEGANS

Hmmm, if we thought vegans were all about love and peace, think Again. Apparently some leftist vegans have an entirely different viewpoint regarding meat eaters.

by Aleister:  

Vegans are vegetarians who won’t even eat products made from animals like butter or cheese. You would think that folks who care so much about animals would be peaceful people. You would be wrong.

Time reported:

Chef Drops Foie Gras From Menu After Vegan Death Threats

A chef in the United Kingdom is backing away from including foie gras on a Valentine’s Day menu after receiving death threats from vegan activists.

The chef at Kings Arms at Fleggburgh opted out of serving the decadent dish during Valentine’s Day dinner this weekend after being subjected to “harassment” by activists who threatened to protest the menu, the Guardian reports. Foie gras is traditionally made by force feeding geese until their liver becomes enlarged.

Mark Dixon, an award winning chef, posted the Valentine’s Day menu on Facebook in January. For 50 pounds per person, diners could indulge in a specialty tasting menu that included vodka cured salmon and grilled halibut. Also on the menu, foie gras and chicken liver parfait which drew the ire of activists. Soon after the menu was posted, the restaurant was reportedly bombarded with phone calls, threats, and fake reservations.

So they won’t eat animals, but they’ll threaten to kill people who do?

Only leftists would think that makes sense.

Source: Progressives Today